A 13,000 km long railway line connecting China to the United States, partially submarine to cover the Bering Strait. This would be the final touch of the Belt and Road initiative, as it would connect the world by rail. But that will never happen, most RailFreight readers said in a website poll this week. Only a small number of people had full confidence in the project, which has been discussed since 2014 and seems to have more people talking than actually building.

It’s called the China-Russia-Canada-America Line, and China first proposed it in 2014. It would start in mainland China, cross Siberia, pass under the sea through the Bering Strait to in Alaska, to continue to Canada and finally the UNITED STATES. It should not be confused with the Bering Strait Tunnel, which is only the part crossing the Bering Strait. This has been on the wish list of engineers for centuries. InterBering, a company based in Alaska, is actively working on the construction of the Bering Strait tunnel.

8% of global freight volumes

The construction of the China-Russia-Canada-America rail line could provide a capacity of 100 million tonnes of freight, or 8% of world freight each year between Europe, Russia, China, Japan, Korea South, Canada and the United States. In addition, it would allow passengers to travel between the United States and Russia in just over 20 minutes if high-speed trains were running on the network. It is also nicknamed the Global Land Bridge, because it would connect the world, advocate those who propose the project.

However, it is not surprising that the majority of RailFreight readers voted with little confidence in the project (56%). Technically, the project is very difficult, the costs are outrageous, and perhaps more importantly, the political relations between the United States, Russia and China are not at their best. What’s more, it’s not entirely clear who will build the tunnel, as the different parties seem to have their respective ambitions.

Technically possible

Technically, crossing the Bering Strait is the most difficult task. If an underwater tunnel were built here, it would be the longest in the world, spanning 103 km. In comparison, the Channel Tunnel, currently the longest in the world, measures 50 km. InterBering, an Alaska-based company, appears to be actively working on the project.

The project would actually involve the construction of three parallel tunnels under the Bering Strait, as well as sections of railroad connecting the rail systems on each of the two continents. InterBering writes. “Two tunnels would accommodate two-way traffic and consist of two levels: the lower part for slower freight and passenger traffic, and an upper level for high-speed trains. The third tunnel would function as an emergency tunnel and would be placed in the middle.

InterBering says “integrate information and management processes with particular emphasis on the organization, financing and construction of an interhemispheric tunnel in the Bering Strait and connecting the railways of two continents, North America and Asia ”. According to the company, the project would take 12 to 15 years, at an estimated cost of 35 billion US dollars.

Expensive items

However, this includes the underwater link alone. To make it a global land bridge connecting China and the United States, new infrastructure must be laid, as there are currently many missing links. On the Russian side, the nearest terminus is 3,000 km away, while in Alaska, the project would require some 1,200 km of new rail line. Complicating matters is that Russian and US railways use different track gauges, writes Ed Peters in the South China Morning Post.

It is this missing infrastructure that makes the project a huge financial challenge. The total estimated costs are around US $ 200 billion, which critics say is disproportionate. As sea routes already exist, it is more viable to continue to navigate by sea, is the argument often heard from opponents.

Different actors involved

Although Interbering claims to “actively lead to a historic agreement between the governors of the State of Alaska (United States) and the Autonomous Okrug of Chukotka (Russia), making this railway tunnel project a future reality, the China seems to be on a whole different page.

As mentioned, China announced plans to build the China-Russia-Canada-America line in 2014. At the time, Chinese engineers claimed to be in talks with Russia to start the line. In addition, it is currently building the world’s first high-speed submarine train, which would stretch from Ningbo, a port city near Shanghai, to Zhoushan, an archipelago of islands off the east coast. Many consider this to be a test project to see if they could complete the longer Bering Strait tunnel.

The Ningbo-Zhoushan tunnel is 77 km long, 16.2 km of which is underwater. Although the submarine section is shorter than the Channel Tunnel, the novelty is that it will facilitate high-speed rail traffic. To be precise, it will have a Maglev train, levitating above a magnetic track as it is propelled at high speed. And this is not a dream project, because it is already underway.

Political will on all sides

It is not excluded that China and Russia will cooperate in this project. After all, they already share the longest railway line in the world: the Trans-Siberia Line. The two countries have worked very closely in recent years to form a bridge between Europe and Asia, and a rail line to the United States would be an extension of that effort.

However, the willingness of the United States to work with Russia and China on this megaproject is less likely. Currently, relations between the United States and Russia are not at their best, and as China becomes the dominant economic player in the world, the United States might not be so keen to facilitate this growth.

At the same time, the benefits will be for all countries involved. “The Bering Strait Railroad and Tunnel Project can help enhance and expand 21st century prosperity by connecting the world’s greatest industrial nations to the vast untapped mineral resources of the Arctic,” said the Governor from Alaska, Wally Hickel.

To carry out the project, the countries involved will all have to participate and contribute. Before a consensus is reached and funding is available from all sides, the China-Russia-Canada-America line will probably remain a dream project.

Want to know more?

Do you want to know more about the traffic to and from China? At RailFreight.com, we write a lot on this topic. Want to make sure you don’t miss a thing? Then you can subscribe to our newsletter.


Source link

Recommended Posts